Legal Opinion

Homeopathic Foundation of California v. Sullivan

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 6, 1934No. Civ. No. 9414PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

The question involved on this appeal is whether or not, under the will of the decedent, sums provided therein for the support of certain beneficiaries are chargeable against the corpus of the trust estate, the income therefrom being insufficient for thé purpose.

Decedent died February 12, 1930, leaving a will dated December 4, 1929, and'a codicil thereto dated January 31, 1930. The will and codicil were admitted to probate and John A. Sullivan, Carlo Serbolisca and George E. Lask were appointed executors thereof. By her will decedent bequeathed general legacies aggregating $15,500 to certain *573as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mulcahy v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  2. Comstock v. HerronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Estate of SchechtmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Christian Science Benevolent Ass'n v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Howaldt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Hawaiian Trust Co. v. BreaultHawaii Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Christian Science Benevolent Ass'n v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API