Legal Opinion

Christian Science Benevolent Ass'n v. Palmer

California Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1946No. L. A. 19201PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

William F. Markham died in 1930. By his will admitted to probate in that year, he named his wife executrix thereof, and trustee of a trust created thereby. The will devised the home property and furnishings to his wife for life, remainder to the children of Mr. and Mrs. Harlan G. Palmer, Sr., and the residue to his wife in trust as follows: “From the gross income received or derived from the trust estate, or from the principal thereof, if the Trustee deem that necessary or advisable, there shall first be paid and discharged all taxes, assessments, costs, attorney fees, charges and expenses…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Estate of MarreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Estate of BournCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Stiebel v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Mackay v. MackayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bright v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Estate of Van DeusenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Estate of LuckelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Peters v. UelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. In Re Trusteeship Created by FiskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API