Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 11, 1933No. 13,342PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THIS is a "Workmen's Compensation" case. Plaintiff in error is hereinafter referred to as Mrs. Rogers, her deceased husband as Rogers, and defendants in error as the commission and the company respectively.

Rogers, an employe of the company, filed claims with the commission for injuries alleged to have resulted from four accidents arising out of and in the course of that employment. The first of these was said to have occurred in the spring of 1919, the second in the fall of 1927, and the last two in the early months of 1928. These claims were contested and, on hearing, finally decided against…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. Aetna Lire InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  2. Empire Zinc Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  2. Contes v. MetrosSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API