Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 13, 1935No. 13,686PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Young

The claimant, widow of Chris Yuenger, deceased, was awarded death benefits by the Industrial Commission, which award was sustained by the district court. The defendants, Colorado National Bant of Denver, as employer, and the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, as insurer, bring the ease to this court on writ of error.

The assignments of error may be considered under two heads: First. That under chapter 177, Session Laws, 1931, section 1, the commission is without authority to set aside the findings of the referee unless its takes additional testimony or has a hearing de novo. Second.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  2. Passini v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  3. Ellermann v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  4. Allen v. GettlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  5. C. S. Card Iron Works Co. v. RadovichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. HavensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  2. Aranguena v. Triumph Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Rathbun v. Taber Tank Lines, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Jacobs v. Village of BuhlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. Industrial Commission v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1955

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API