Legal Opinion

Kazerouni v. De Satnick

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 1991No. B046018PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ASHBY, J.

In this action on a promissory note, the court by nonjury trial gave judgment for plaintiff and respondent Akbar Kazerouni against defendants and appellants Steve and Mary De Satnick. The judgment further provides that appellants take nothing by their cross-complaint for breach of warranty.

Respondent sold his business (Photo Run Inc., a photo-developing store) to appellants for $310,000, taking back a promissory note for $101,000 payable at $1,500 per month. After four payments appellants defaulted on the note. The issue at trial was whether appellants’ performance was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Hauter v. ZogartsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Keith v. BuchananCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Grinnell v. Charles Pfizer & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Rosemary Foster v. Colorado Radio Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pegasus Management Co., Inc. v. Lyssa, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
  2. Moncada v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
  3. Jue v. SmiserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Telephia, Inc. v. CuppyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API