Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Hickman

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 1984No. Civ. A. No. 83-1313PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

WEBER, District Judge.

Counsel for Defendant Parker/Hunter has filed a puzzling motion with the unwieldy title of “Motion for Leave to Join Third-Party Defendant on the Plaintiffs’ Claim and to Add a Defendant on Parker/Hunter’s Crossclaim and Counterclaim.” Although awkward titles do not violate the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, (and perhaps they should), the body of this motion reveals some fundamental confusion on the part of counsel on the Rules for pleading claims by a defendant.

First of all, the motion repeatedly refers to Defendant Parker/Hunter’s “Crossclaim”…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo Bank v. GillelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
  2. United States ex rel. Branch Consultants, L.L.C. v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2010
  3. HOUSING AUTH. OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY v. JacksonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
  4. Brooks v. HickmanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Church Mutual Insurance v. Save-a-Buck Car Rental Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API