Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Hickman
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 13, 1984No. Civ. A. No. 83-1313PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WEBER, District Judge.
This represents our second in a growing series of lectures in this case on proper third-party practice. See Brooks v. Hickman, 101 F.R.D. 16 (W.D.Pa.1984). However, we must first take a moment to address Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend the Complaint.
Plaintiffs have moved to amend their complaint to allege wanton and reckless administration of their investments by the defendant Parker/Hunter,1 and to claim both compensatory and punitive damages on this count. Defendant has opposed this amendment, contending that it is untimely, unfounded and an attempt to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Otto T. Schwab v. Erie Lackawanna Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Brooks v. HickmanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Mickelic v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Brooks v. HickmanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- King Fisher Marine Service, Inc. v. 21st Phoenix Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- HOUSING AUTH. OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY v. JacksonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
- King Fisher Marine Service, Inc. v. Hanson Development Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1987
- King Fisher Marine Service, Inc., a Texas Corporation v. 21st Phoenix Corporation, F/k/a the Hanson Development Company, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellee v. Langan Engineering Associates, Inc., a Corporation, Third-Party-Defendant-Appellant, Highlands Insurance Company, a Texas Corporation, Third-Party-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990