Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Marcheta Investors Ltd. Partnership
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 7, 1998No. 96-CV-416PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
After her original complaint was dismissed for want of prosecution and a second complaint, filed in the United States District Court, was dismissed as time-barred, appellant filed a motion in the Superior Court under Super.Ct.Civ.R. 60(b) to vacate the dismissal of the first complaint. The Rule 60(b) motion was denied, and appellant noted this appeal. We affirm.
I
Appellant Inell Johnson is a resident of California. On July 31,1991, while she was a guest at the Hampshire Suites Hotel in the District of Columbia, she was allegedly injured when a hotel employee, opening a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Bond v. SeranoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Clement v. District of Columbia Department of Human ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Sayyad v. FawziDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Joseph v. ParekhDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Nattah v. BushDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Peart v. Latham and Watkins LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Jane Doe v. Kipp DC Supporting Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Wagshal v. RiglerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.