Legal Opinion
Joseph v. Parekh
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 29, 1976No. 9553PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Per curiam
This appeal followed the entry of orders of the trial court which (1) denied appellant’s motion to vacate and set aside, pursuant to Super.Ct.Civ.R. 60(b)(1) or (6), the dismissal of his complaint for libel, (2) granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment, and (3) denying appellant’s motion to extend the time for áppeal.
The action commenced in January 1972, came on for a status conference on October 18, 1974, and counsel were directed to file all pretrial motions by November 4, 1974, submit responses thereto by November 14, 1974, and file pretrial statements conforming with CA Form 103 by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- In the Matter of Emanuel JosephsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
- Universal Film Exchanges, Inc. v. Bernard Lust, Trading as Sydney Lust Theatres, and Independent Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- Molton G. Smith v. Walter T. Stone, Chief Division of Adult Paroles of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Jones v. HuntDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Wallace v. Warehouse Employees Union No. 730District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Lynch v. Meridian Hill Studio Apts., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Starling v. Jephunneh Lawrence & AssociatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Launay v. Launay, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Dunn v. ProfittDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.