Legal Opinion

Mackay v. Lane

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided December 12, 2024No. 2:24-cv-01200Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 DEANNA M. MACKAY, Case No. 2:24-cv-01200-JAD-NJK 7 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 8 v. [Docket No. 5] 9 JUDGE ROBERT W. LANE, et al., 10 Defendant(s). 11 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and has requested authority pursuant to 12

28 U.S.C. § 1915

to proceed in forma pauperis. 13 I. In Forma Pauperis Application 14 After the Court denied her first application as incomplete, Docket No. 4, Plaintiff filed an 15 amended application to proceed in forma pauperis as required by § 1915(a), Docket No. 5. 16 Plaintiff has therein shown an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API