Legal Opinion

Swinerton & Walberg Co. v. Union Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 1, 1972No. Civ. 38375PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLEMING, J.

Union Bank (Bank) appeals a portion of a judgment imposing an equitable hen in favor of Swinerton & Walberg Co. (Swinerton) on funds held by Bank in a construction loan disbursement account.

Facts

In February 1964 James and Audrey Casey (Casey) contracted with Swinerton, a building contractor, for the construction of a 7 8-unit apartment building on Casey’s property in Redondo Beach at a price of $785,000. To finance construction and related expenses Casey in March 1964 borrowed $892,000 from Bank, signing a promissory note secured in part by a trust deed on the property.

Casey…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. Anglo-California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Miller v. Mountain View Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. A-1 Door & Materials Co. v. Fresno Guarantee Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Jones v. Sacramento Sav. & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. McBain v. Santa Clara Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Embree Construction Group, Inc. v. Rafcor, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Pankow Construction Co. v. Advance Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. Boyd & Lovesee Lumber v. Western Pacific FinancialCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Embree Construction Group, Inc. v. Rafcor, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API