Goldwire v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.
The defendants, Bennie Goldwire and Mildred Goldwire, were tried together under an accusation which charged that they “did unlawfully keep, maintain, employ and carry on a certain scheme and device for the hazarding of money other than a lottery, said scheme and device being known as and called 'Bolita’.” Both defendants were convicted. They made identical motions for a new trial, based upon the usual grounds and one special ground. The motions were overruled and the defendants excepted.
1. In special ground 1 of the motions for a new trial, error is assigned “because the court erred in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Meyer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Kolshorn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Polite v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Figures v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Gibson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Notis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951