Legal Opinion

Meyer v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 27, 1900PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Accusation of misdemeanor.. Before Judge Eve. City court-of Richmond county. July 6, 1900.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

Meyer was arraigned on an accusation under the. Penal Code, §407, which declares that “ No person, by himself, or another, shall keep, maintain, employ, or carry on any lottery in this State, or other scheme or device for the hazarding of any money or valuable thing.” The accused was tried by the judge of the city court of Richmond county, presiding without a jury, upon an agreed statement of facts; and was convicted. That portion of the agreed statement of facts upon which the judgment of conviction was based was, in substance, as follows: The accused was a wholesale and retail dealer in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Horner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Hudelson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Prendergast v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  4. State v. MumfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  5. Chavannah v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1873

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Equitable Loan & Security Co. v. WaringSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. State Ex Rel. Evans v. Brotherhood of FriendsWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. State v. Village of Garden CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Elder v. CampSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. State v. . LipkinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API