Legal Opinion · Dissent

Howard v. Burton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 5, 1985No. 83-941Published

1Dissent

I respectfully dissent. It is my opinion that the majority misconstrues § 5-1-25, Code 1975. At first blush the operative language of the section might seem to dictate the result reached by the majority. A closer inspection of the statute, however, yields a different result.

Section 5-1-25 provides that when bank deposits are made in "the names of two persons payable to either of such persons, or payable to the survivor of them, the deposit shall, upon the death of either of said persons, become the property of . . . the survivor." The majority construes the statute to mean that where money on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LovettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Lovett v. UptainCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API