Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Lovett

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 23, 1984No. 83-267PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted the petition for certiorari because the petitioner earnestly insists that the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals is in conflict with § 5-5A-41, Ala. Code 1975, andHarris v. Dial, 398 So.2d 679 (Ala. 1981). We affirm.

As reflected in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, the certificate of deposit was carried on the bank's records in the names of Cora Spruell or Betty Lovett. It was not disputed that the funds represented by the certificate were acquired by Mrs. Spruell upon the death of her husband. As between the claimants to the proceeds, here, the administratrix of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hicks v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Clark v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. Harris v. DialSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Parr v. GodwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Hart v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Gainer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  4. Andrews v. Troy Bank and Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Farmer v. FarmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API