Legal Opinion

Byron v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 7, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

The defendant’s station at Exeter is upon the south side of two parallel main tracks, the southerly of which is known as the “east-bound,” and the northerly as the “west-bound.” The main platform is between the station and the east-bound track, and is partially protected by a projecting roof in front of the station and by open awnings or roofs extending east and west therefrom. The middle platform separates the two tracks .and is uncovered. Both platforms are of concrete construction, and are connected by four planked crossings, two of which are located in front of the station, the remaining…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. DodgeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
  2. Derosier v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
  3. Boody v. K. & C. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  4. Prichard v. BoscawenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1916
  5. Sevigny v. J. Spaulding & Sons Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gerry v. NeugebauerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  2. Cable v. Donahue & Hamlin, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  3. Smith v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
  4. Kerzty v. WardymkaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
  5. Wilson v. Berlin Street RailwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API