Wilson v. Berlin Street Railway
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.
It is the general rule that a street railway must se-
lect a reasonably safe place for landing its passengers. Harrington v. Railway, 76 N. H. 575; Bass v. Railway, 70 N. H. 170; Call v. Railway, 69 N. H. 562, 564. The defendant does not question this rule so far as it relates to inter-urban transit, but contends that it does not apply to railways traversing city streets over which they have no control.
It is further suggested that the place where the plaintiff alighted was as safe as the circumstances would permit; that the ice and ruts extended the entire length of the street, and that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bass v. Concord Street RailwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1899
- Byron v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
- Hickey v. BerlinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1915
- Call v. Portsmouth, Kittery & York Street RailwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1899
- Osgood v. United States Health & Accident Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cable v. Donahue & Hamlin, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931