Legal Opinion

Block v. Greenfield

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 24, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.

Plaintiff and defendant were the sole stockholders in a corporation known as Green Mills, Inc. They decided to dissolve the corporation and so agreed. In order to permit the -withdrawal of the capital, it was agreed to cancel all outstanding contracts with the exception of one with the Bedford Mills, Inc., for the purchase of cotton piece goods. The defendant was interested in a business using similar goods and requested plaintiff to permit such contract to remain in force, defendant in consideration thereof agreeing to assume it and to hold plaintiff harmless. To this arrangement plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White v. . RintoulNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Tighe v. . MorrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Jones v. . BaconNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Conkey v. HopkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1819

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Tomaso, Feitner and Lane, Inc. v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Healy v. BrotmanNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Braverman v. Metropolis Bowling Centers, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API