Legal Opinion
Braverman v. Metropolis Bowling Centers, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 19, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtLouis B. Heller, J.
Motion pursuant to rule 107 of the Buies of Civil Practice, for dismissal of the first and second causes of action constituting the complaint, on the ground that ‘ ‘ the contract upon which each of said causes of action is founded” is unenforcible under the Statute of Frauds; and in the alternative, for an order striking certain allegations from the complaint pursuant to rule 103 of the Buies of Civil Practice.
The first cause of action alleges in substance that plaintiffs performed, at the request of the defendants, and pursuant to agreement between said parties, certain work, labor and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Martocci v. Greater New York Brewery, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Harmon v. Alfred Peats Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Johnston v. . TraskNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Tighe v. . MorrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Gibson v. Archer Productions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Braverman v. Metropolis Bowling Centers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963