Legal Opinion

Hitz v. Jenks

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 14, 1887PublishedCited by 29 opinions

In equity. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

The original suit was a bill in equity, filed January 10,1879, by ICeyser, as the receiver of the German American National Bank, against Hitz and wife, Donaldson, Prentiss, Chipley, Halstead, Crane, Tyler and Jenks, to enforce a deed, in the nature of a mortgage, dated January 26, 1876, by which Hitz and wife conveyed land in Washington to Donaldson and Prentiss, in trust to secure the payment of promissory notes for $20,000, made by Chipley, indorsed by Halstead and held by the bank; as well as to set aside, as made in fraud of the bank, the following conveyances of the same land : 1st. A…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Lessee of PeirsolSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Teal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Sims v. EverhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Central Bank v. CopelandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
  5. Hartley v. FroshTexas Supreme Court · 1851

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Gordon v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Spalding v. MasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Atlantic Trust Co. v. DanaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  4. Chaussee v. Morning Star Ranch Resorts Co. (In Re Morning Star Ranch Resorts)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1986
  5. Mortgage Loan Co. v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API