Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Garcia

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 26, 1993No. 92-1097PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

At the time the trial court ordered a new trial on the grounds that the jury verdict was against the manifest weight of the evidence, it did not have the benefit of the recent Florida Supreme Court opinion Easkold v. Rhodes, 614 So.2d 495 (Fla.1993). The Easkold court held that the jury could properly reach a finding contrary to uncon-tradicted expert witness testimony. Therefore, we reverse and remand with instructions to the trial court to enter a judgment for Appellant in accordance with the jury verdict.

STONE and FARMER, JJ. and MAY, MELANIE, Associate Judge, concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Easkold v. RhodesSupreme Court of Florida · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rigdon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA v. PoucherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. Allstate Ins. Co. v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. US Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. PerezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993