Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Way
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 23, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendants Fred D. Way III and Law Offices of Fred D. *873Way (hereinafter together the defendants) contend that the Supreme Court erred in denying that branch of their motion which was to set aside so much of the jury verdict as was in favor of the plaintiffs and against them awarding compensatory damages in the principal sum of $29,100 and for judgment as a matter of law on the ground that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of legal malpractice, or in the alternative, for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. We disagree.
A…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zarin v. Reid & PriestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Carrasco v. Pena & KahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Adelman v. AttonitoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Baccash v. SayeghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Zelaya v. BregerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shkolnik v. KrutoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Smith v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Yakubov v. GaftAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024