Legal Opinion

Carrasco v. Pena & Kahn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 5, 2008PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Agate, J.), dated August 15, 2006, as granted the motion of the defendants Pena & Kahn, Steven L. Kahn, and Jesus Pena for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

*396Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

To prevail in an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must establish that the defendant attorney failed to exercise the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Rudolf v. Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & SauerNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Ippolito v. McCormack, Damiani, Lowe & MellonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Shopsin v. Siben & Siben, Esqs.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Crawford v. McBrideAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Kluczka v. LecciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Gelobter v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Alaimo v. MongelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Terio v. SpodekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API