Marsh v. Cook
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On final hearing on bill and answers, and proofs taken orally before the vice-chancellor.
1Opinion of the Court
The Vice-Chancellor.
The complainant seeks a decree adjudging that a mortgage made by her to the defendant is void, because obtained by fraud. Two'grounds are specified: Eirst, that the defendant procured hereto .execute a mortgage to. him for a sum largely in excess of the debt really due; and, second, that heTnduhM'"h®Ho'Vxecute"it byTalsely representing that it was not a mortgage, but merely a written acknowledgment of her indebtedness to him.
The proof in support of the first ground is very feeble^ Aside from certain admissions imputed to the' defendant, *263there is scarcely anything worthy to…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Trautwein v. BozzoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- State v. CrolandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- National Manufacturers Co. v. BirdNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
- Myers v. VogtNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927