Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Cook

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1880PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On final hearing on bill and answers, and proofs taken orally before the vice-chancellor.

1Opinion of the Court

The Vice-Chancellor.

The complainant seeks a decree adjudging that a mortgage made by her to the defendant is void, because obtained by fraud. Two'grounds are specified: Eirst, that the defendant procured hereto .execute a mortgage to. him for a sum largely in excess of the debt really due; and, second, that heTnduhM'"h®Ho'Vxecute"it byTalsely representing that it was not a mortgage, but merely a written acknowledgment of her indebtedness to him.

The proof in support of the first ground is very feeble^ Aside from certain admissions imputed to the' defendant, *263there is scarcely anything worthy to…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Trautwein v. BozzoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. State v. CrolandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  3. National Manufacturers Co. v. BirdNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  4. Myers v. VogtNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API