Legal Opinion
State v. Croland
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 23, 1959PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
54 N.J. Super. 594 (1959)
149 A.2d 821
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
WILLIAM H. CROLAND AND MARVIN ZALK, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 22, 1958.
Decided March 23, 1959.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and HANEMAN.
Mr. Paul T. Murphy argued the cause for defendant-appellant Zalk (Messrs. Crummy, Gibbons and O'Neill, attorneys).
Mr. Sanford Freedman argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Charles V. Webb, Jr., attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, J.A.D.
The defendants Croland and Zalk were convicted…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ferdinand v. Agricultural Ins. Co. of Watertown, NYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- State v. DancygerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Willis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- State v. KaufmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- State v. SamurineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BlanchardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- State v. ParrisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- State v. AllenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- State v. PritchardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979