Legal Opinion

Davis v. Hodin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1954No. Appeal, No. 15Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

This is an action in assumpsit by a seller to recover the purchase price of cheese, less credit for amounts realized by the seller in minimizing damages after the defendant buyers had rescinded and returned most of the goods. The jury rendered a verdict for the defendants. The plaintiff’s motion for judgment n.o.v. was refused by the court below and plaintiff has appealed.

The jury verdict has admittedly, for the purpose of this appeal, determined the questions of blame for deterioration of the cheese and adequate notice of rescission in favor of the defendants. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moskowitz v. Flock and FlockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Gibson v. Stainless Steel Sales Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Gibson v. Stainless Steel Sales Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API