Moskowitz v. Flock and Flock
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Parker, J.,
This action in assumpsit grew out of an alleged breach of warranty on a sale of yarn by the defendants, Sol M. Flock and Emanuel Flock, partners trading as the Flock Manufacturing Company, to the plaintiff, Ernest Moskowitz, trading as Ermos Hat Company, and involves the right of the buyer to rescind the contract without returning all the goods delivered to the buyer.
We will summarize the allegations of the statement of claim. On May 24, 1930, plaintiff purchased by sample from the defendants twenty-five pounds of a “very fine grade of imported angora yarn” and thereafter…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Portfolio v. . RubinNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Elzea v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Luria Bros. & Co. v. KlaffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
- Kase v. JohnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
- Fiterman v. J. N. Johnson & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lichtenstein v. Anderson (In Re Eastern Continuous Forms, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Industrial Rayon Corp. v. CaplanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Paramount Paper Products Co. v. LynchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Bennett v. Perlstein Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Bornstein v. Hanes, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.