Legal Opinion
Anthony M. Meyerstein, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 31, 1956No. 49531PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LARAMORE, Judge.
Plaintiff claims damages arising out of alleged breaches by defendant of a lump sum equipment contract. This contract called for the design and construction by plaintiff, according to defendant’s specifications, of two 125-ton ocean-going cranes.
'plaintiff contends that it was misled by the plans and specifications furnished by defendant as to the quantity of steel it would have to furnish to construct the cranes. It also contends that defendant required “illegal changes” in the contract which it claims also resulted in an ovérrun of steel used.
This case arises out of a Navy…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Montrose Contracting Co. v. County of WestchesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Union Paving Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- Dubois Const. Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
- Callahan Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- L. W. Foster Sportswear Co., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Philip Krupp v. Federal Housing AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.