Wessel, Duval & Co. v. Winborne & Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of city of Norfolk in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant assigns error. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.
This was an action of assumpsit in which the declaration contained only a consolidated money count, wherein the plaintiff (defendant in error) claimed of the defendants (plaintiffs in error) $324.35 for money lent and advanced by the plaintiff to the defendants, and the like sum of $324.35 for money by the defendants had and received to and for the use of the plaintiff. No affidavit or account was filed with the declaration, nor were the defendants otherwise informed of the nature of the plaintiff’s demand. The defendants were non-residents, and, as ancillary to the action, the plaintiff sued…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lester v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
- Virginia Brewing Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912
3Cited by8 opinions
- Blanton v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. (In Re Blanton)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
- Williams v. ConsolvoSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
- Cappetta v. GC SERVICES LTD. PARTNERSHIPDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
- Lamont v. SeaburyFairfax County Circuit Court · 2004
- Amica Mutual Ins. v. Liberty Mutual Fire Ins.Loudoun County Circuit Court · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.