Legal Opinion
Forkner v. Twin City Fire Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 12, 1927No. 4758PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.
On motion of defendant, the District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky dismissed a bill in equity wherein complainant sought to reform two fire insurance policies to conform, as he alleged, to agreements that he had made with the agent of the defendant company. .The policies contained provisions rendering them void if a gasoline engine was used in or within 15 feet of any building described in the policies, “unless the written consent of the company is obtained and the additional premium charge made therefor,” or if additional insurance was procured on the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Lumber Underwriters of NY v. RifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Northern Assurance Co. of London v. Grand View Building Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Ackerlind v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bates v. Grain Dealers National Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
- Norwich Union Indemnity Co. v. H. Kobacker & Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
- Home Ins. Co. of New York v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
- Bennett v. Cosmopolitan Fire Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.