Legal Opinion

Brackx v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 24, 1997No. Civil Action 96-40258PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING, IN PART, DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GADOLA, District Judge.

Before the court is defendant, The Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company’s (“MML”), motion for partial summary judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c), filed on November 8, 1996. In that motion, defendant seeks summary judgment as to Counts I, II and III of plaintiff, Charles Braekx’s (“Brackx”), four count complaint. Oral argument was heard on February 19, 1997. At oral argument, plaintiff’s counsel conceded that summary judgment is…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Ovall Dale Kendall v. The Hoover CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  5. 60 Ivy Street Corporation (86-5500), and Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc., (86-5517) v. R.C. Alexander and Doris AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Provident Life & Accident Insurance v. AdieDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API