Legal Opinion

Pitchford v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 12, 1997No. 16-95-03865; CA A90198PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, P. J.

In this proceeding submitted to the court on stipulated facts and stipulated questions pursuant to ORCP 66, plaintiff sought underinsurance motorist (UIM) benefits from his own automobile insurer for injuries that he sustained in a motor vehicle accident. Defendant appeals from the $28,334 judgment for plaintiff, contending that the trial court erred in failing to credit against the UIM policy limits the payment that plaintiff received from the underinsured motorist coverage of his employer’s automobile insurance policy, the full amount of the workers’ compensation benefits that plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vega v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. California Casualty Indemnity Exchange v. MaritzenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. LangridgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Bergmann v. HuttonOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Wright v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Grijalva v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Surface v. American Spirit Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API