Legal Opinion

Craig v. Baumgartner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 23, 1934No. 29,634PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion

Plaintiff petitions the court to amend its order herein and to instruct the trial court that plaintiff should be permitted to amend her pleadings so as to seek specific performance of the original (1909) contract.

The allowance of such amendment is a matter properly directed to the trial court's discretion. This court will assume that the question will he decided in accordance with established rules of practice with a view to seeing that substantial justice is accomplished and "in the furtherance of justice." Erickson v. Bjertness, 167 Minn. 323, 325, 209 N.W. 32.

Petition denied.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Erickson v. BjertnessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Craig v. BaumgartnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934