Wadas v. Sharp
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
. Appeal, No. 91, Oct. T., 1904, by David E. Lewis, from decree of C. P. Del. Co., March T., 1902, No. 213, and Dec. T., 1902, No. 5, dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report in cases of George T. Wadas v. Thomas G. Sharp and David E. Lewis v. Thomas G. Sharp. Exceptions to report of David M. Johnson, Jr., Esq., auditor. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Errors assigned were in dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bt
Beaver, J.,
A fund, arising from the sale of Sharp’s personal property, was paid into court and its distribution referred to an auditor. There were three claimants : first, Wadas, xan execution creditor, who claimed by virtue of a fi. fa. issued May 6, 1902, upon a judgment entered that day; second, Lewis, an execution creditor, who claimed by virtue of a fi'. fa. issued December 1, 1902, upon a judgment entered the same day; third, the landlord, who claimed rent due from August 1, 1902, less $16.66, upon a lease for $400 per year, payable monthly.
It appears from the evidence that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Landis v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Platt-Barber Co. v. GrovesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Earl's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850
- Freeburger's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
- William Broadhead & Sons v. CornmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Shalet v. KlauderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
- Globe Sol. v. Nouskhajian, (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Groh v. KimCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- In re LynchDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1914
- Boggs v. WaltonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.