Legal Opinion

Platt-Barber Co. v. Groves

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 6, 1899No. Appeal, No. 84½PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal, No. 84½, Oct. T., 1899, by defendant, from decree of Superior Court, Oct. T., 1898, No. 22, in reversing decree of C. P. Jefferson Co., May T., 1896, Nos. 40 and 41. Appeal from Superior Court. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. The case is reported in 7 Pa. Superior Ct. 599. Error assigned was in reversing the order of the court of common pleas.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Mitchell,

1. A motion is made to quash this appeal, on the ground, first, that no appeal was in fact taken, and secondly, that even if what was done was equivalent to an appeal, it was too late.

*477The judgment of the Superior Court was entered on July 29, 1898. On August 26, 1898, on petition of the present appellant, a rule was granted by our brother Dean returnable to the second Monday of October, to show cause why an appeal should not be allowed. On March 27, 1899, this rule was made absolute by the Court, and appeal allowed. Counsel deeming this allowance of his petition…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Landis v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  2. Earl's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850
  3. Freeburger's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
  4. William Broadhead & Sons v. CornmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Stroudsburg Bank v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nixon v. NixonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Milford Borough v. BurnettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. In re Foster's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  4. Donley v. SemansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. Wadas v. SharpSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API