Legal Opinion
Granger v. Gill Abstract Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 18, 2008No. 07 Civ. 3491(PKC)(THK)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
P. KEVIN CASTEL, District Judge.
This pro se copyright infringement action is premised, in part, upon the defendants’ unauthorized use of plaintiffs original and copyrighted computer program for calculating title insurance rates. The copyrighted computer program was used without authorization on the web site of defendant Gill Abstract Corporation.
I have referred all case dispositive motions to Magistrate Judge Theodore H. Katz to hear and report. 28 U.S.C. § 686(b)(1)(B) & (C). On June 23, 2008, Magistrate Judge Katz filed and transmitted a Report and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Shirley Small v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- In Re Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. Securities, Derivative, & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- BanxCorp v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- MMA Consultants 1, Inc. v. Republic of PeruDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- In Re DaytonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Graham v. PrinceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.