Legal Opinion

Furlong v. Manufacturers National Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1938No. Docket Nos. 14, 15, 16, Calendar Nos. 40,021, 40,022, 40,023PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

These three cases, involving similar facts, were tried simultaneously in the lower court and consolidated on appeal to this court. On June 8, 1935, plaintiffs discovered that one Keeler, employed by them, had caused their firm’s checks to be improperly issued to a customer, one O. J. Rieman, as payee, had forged the latter’s indorsement on the backs of the checks, and had obtained the proceeds from defendant banks. The banks, in turn, had charged the amounts of the checks against plaintiffs ’ respective accounts. On the very same day, plaintiffs wrote to each of the banks calling their…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Houseman-Spitzley Corp. v. American State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Union Guardian Trust Co. v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. People Ex Rel. P. Koenig Coal Co. v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. First National Bank of McAlester v. MannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Ielmini v. Bessemer National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Lieberman v. SolomonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. In Re Dunneback's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API