Legal Opinion

Schott v. Hartmann

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 22, 1979Published

1Opinion of the Court

*595The opinion of the court was delivered by

MICHELS, J. A. D.

By leave granted, third-party defendant Chase Manhattan Bank (Chase) appeals from an order of the Law Division denying its motion to vacate the service of process and to dismiss the third-party complaint on the ground that it, as a national bank, may not be sued in New Jersey by virtue of the general provisions of the National Bank Act. Rev. Stat. § 5198 (1875), 12 U.S.C.A. § 94.

This action was instituted in the Law Division by plaintiff Kenneth Schott who sought to recover compensatory and punitive damages for personal injuries…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API