Legal Opinion

State ex rel. McMonies v. McMonies

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1906No. 13,973PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the district court for Burt county: Edmund M. Bartlett, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Duffie, C.

The first, third, fourth and seventh sections of ordinance No. 84 of the village of Lyons, Nebraska, are in the following language:

“Section 1. Each and every person, firm and association, corporation, or other organization, carrying on the occupation or business hereinafter mentioned, within the corporate limits of the village of Lyons, Nebraska, shall pay to the treasurer of said village annually, as a tax upon said occupation, or business, from the first Tuesday in May of each year the sums hereinafter provided.”
*444“Section 3. There is hereby levied an annual tax upon occupation and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hurford v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
  2. State v. MottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
  3. Morgan v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  4. State ex rel. Ransom v. IreyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Sexson v. KelleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jewel Tea Co. v. City of GenevaNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  2. City of Malden v. FlynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. Simpkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Cole v. Village of CulbertsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  5. City of Milford v. SchmidtNebraska Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API