Legal Opinion

Morgan v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1902No. Nos. 12,478 and 12,479PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from the district court for Otoe county. Tried below before Jessen, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, C. J.

These cases were submitted together on the same briefs, and will be disposed of in one opinion. In each case the defendant, Morgan, was convicted of violating a village ordinance, which was clearly intended to regulate and tax the business of keeping a pool and billard room. Under the stipulation of the parties, the validity of the ordinance is the only question properly before us for decision. The first contention of the defendant is that the village authorities in the adoption of the ordinance, attempted to exercise a power which the legislature had not conferred upon them. This contention…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. McPherson v. BlackerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Grimes v. EddySupreme Court of Missouri · 1894

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re JonesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. City of Burlingame v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. Ex parte RoweAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Richter v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API