Legal Opinion

Neiman v. Watkins

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 1964No. Appeal, No. 56PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Flood, J.,

Does the contributory negligence of a wife operate to bar recovery of damages by both husband and wife for negligent injury to an automobile owned by them in the entireties? The answer to this question is determinative of the appeal before us. While this specific issue has not previously come before our appellate courts, earlier decisions point unmistakably to the answer.

The manifest advantage to the spouses from ownership in the entireties are accompanied by an occasional disadvantage. One of the consequences of the unity and indivisibility of such ownership is that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Madden v. Glosztonyi Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Rodgers Et Ux. v. SaxtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Parks v. ParksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Lindenfelser v. LindenfelserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. MALONEY v. RodgersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Werner v. Quality Service Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Forman v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Arnett v. HanbySuperior Court of Delaware · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API