Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Scofield v. Schaaf

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1936No. 26045. En BancPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

On or about December 26, 1935, the Washington Navigation Company, a corporation, was, and for a number of years had been, the holder of certificates of public convenience and necessity, issued after the effective date of chapter 248, Laws of 1927, p. 382, Rem. Rev. Stat., §§ 10361-1, 10361-2 [P. C. §§ 5552-1, 5552-2], for the operation of ferry boats over and across the waters of Puget Sound over several routes, each of which routes is altogether or partly within Pierce county. On that day, the navigation company filed a schedule of rates, fares and charges with the department of public…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Webster v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Denney v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. State ex rel. City of Spokane v. KuykendallWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State ex rel. Ellertsen v. Home Telephone & Telegraph Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. State ex rel. Allen v. Public Service CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Toll Bridge Auth. v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State Ex Rel. Kitsap County Transportation Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. State Ex Rel. Washington Navigation Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State Ex Rel. Toll Bridge Auth. v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State Ex Rel. Washington Navigation Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API