Legal Opinion

Sernaker v. Mossinghoff

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1984No. Civ. 84-0829PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DITTER, District Judge.

In this action, plaintiff sought a temporary restraining order to prevent issuance of a patent. I refused his motion, concluding he had failed to show a likelihood of success on the merits, the possibility of irreparable harm, and that the public interest would be served by an injunction. See United States v. Price, 688 F.2d 204, 211 (3d Cir.1982).

Plaintiff claims the commissioner of patents abused his discretion in failing to hold a “public use proceeding,” provision for which is made by 37 C.F.R. § 1.292. Because I had grave doubts about this court’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  2. Gatter v. NimmoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  3. Goldhaber v. FoleyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Goodbar v. BannerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  5. Godtfredsen v. BannerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Georgia-Pacific Corporation, a Georgia Corporation, Counter-Defendant v. Kai Lieberam, Counter-ClaimantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Aqua Pennsylvania Wastewater, Inc. v. City of Chester, PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API