Legal Opinion

Atkins v. Pfaffe

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 16, 1907PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Keolcuk .Superior Court.— Hok. W. L. Me- • Namaba, Judge. This is an action in equity, brought by plaintiff to compel tbe removal by defendant of certain obstructions placed on ber property by him, and to enjoin further acts of trespass. On the filing of the petition, a temporary writ of injunction issued.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Keolcuk .Superior Court.— Hok. W. L. Me- • Namaba, Judge. This is an action in equity, brought by plaintiff to compel tbe removal by defendant of certain obstructions placed on ber property by him, and to enjoin further acts of trespass. On the filing of the petition, a temporary writ of injunction issued. Following this, and before answer, plaintiff came in, and, on application, secured an order requiring defendant to appear and show cause why he should not be held in contempt for a violation of the mandate of the temporary writ. In response to such order, the defendant appeared,…

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

Block 140 in the city of Keokuk is bounded on the east by Ninth street and on the north by Exchange street. The lots in the block face Exchange street, and number west from Ninth street. In October, 1886, plaintiff became the owner of parts of lots 1, 2, and 3, described in the deed to her substantially as the south seventy feet of the north one hundred and five feet of the three lots. In the following year she erected a frame house on the property, facing east on Ninth street, which she has ever since occupied in person or by tenants. In August, 1903, the defendant purchased the north…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. Mills CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  2. Wilmarth v. WoodcockMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. O'Callaghan v. WhisenandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  4. Murphy v. BolgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888
  5. Smith v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Balestrieri v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API