In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Witteman
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Brachtenbach, C.J. —
This is an attorney disciplinary proceeding referred to this court upon a recommendation by the Disciplinary Board of the Washington State Bar Association that respondent attorney be suspended from the practice of law for a period of 30 days. Respondent, admitted to practice in 1969, practices in Vancouver.
A 2-count complaint was filed against respondent attorney. Count 1 alleged respondent's guilty plea to one count of failure to file a federal income tax return.
Count 2 alleged neglect of a legal matter, conduct involv*937ing deceit or dishonesty and intentional failure to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceedings Against SeijasWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against CaseWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against CaughlanWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceedings Against CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1963
3Cited by8 opinions
- Disciplinary Proceeding v. NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against WittemanWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Disciplinary Proc. Against VanderveenWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.