Legal Opinion

In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Witteman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1981No. C.D. 6596PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brachtenbach, C.J. —

This is an attorney disciplinary proceeding referred to this court upon a recommendation by the Disciplinary Board of the Washington State Bar Association that respondent attorney be suspended from the practice of law for a period of 30 days. Respondent, admitted to practice in 1969, practices in Vancouver.

A 2-count complaint was filed against respondent attorney. Count 1 alleged respondent's guilty plea to one count of failure to file a federal income tax return.

Count 2 alleged neglect of a legal matter, conduct involv*937ing deceit or dishonesty and intentional failure to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In Re the Disciplinary Proceedings Against SeijasWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against CaseWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  4. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against CaughlanWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. In Re the Disciplinary Proceedings Against CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Proceeding v. NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In Re NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against WittemanWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. In Re Disciplinary Proc. Against VanderveenWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API