State v. Glover

The first point urged as ground for reversing the conviction of plaintiff in error, charged with larceny of two horses, is the denial of his challenge taken to» an individual juror for the reason that between him and the State’s attorney conducting the prosecution the relation of attorney and client existed at the time of trial. So far as pertinent to the question thus presented, the Legislature of 1903 specified the only causes for challenging jurors on account of implied bias as follows: “(1) Consanguinity or affinity within the sixth degree, inclusive, to the person alleged to be injured…