Creighan v. Firemen's Relief & Pension Fund Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Musmanno,
James Creighan, fireman, has brought an action of mandamus against the Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund Board of the City of Pittsburgh for pension benefits under the Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund Law of May 25, 1933, P. L. 1050, as amended (53 P.S. §23601 et seq.) hereinafter referred to for brevity’s sake as the Pension Law.
Creighan became- a fireman in the City of Pittsburgh on May 11, 1937, and performed the duties of a hoseman until February 22, 1949, when tuberculosis of the respiratory system forced him into a sanitarium (Leech Farm) where he…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burns's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- McCauley v. Imperial Woolen Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Creighan v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Billo v. Allegheny Steel CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- State ex rel. McManus v. Board of Trustees of the Policemen's Pension FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Pawlosky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Bernard S. Pincus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Hayden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Superior Precast, Inc. v. Safeco Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.