Legal Opinion

Hallman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 9, 2003No. 1D02-2694PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Haying reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We affirm Appellant’s revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence. However, because the trial court failed to enter a written order of revocation, we remand for the trial court to enter such an order. Cozart v. State, 823 So.2d 234 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

AFFIRMED.

ALLEN, C.J., and BOOTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Cozart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Veazy v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Dunklin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. Pressley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005