State v. Tunnell
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
The appellants were convicted of violation of the liquor law, Section 6588, Revised Statutes 1919, as amended by the Act of 1921, Laws 1921, p. 414, et seq. The information is in three counts.
' The first count charged the defendants with having in their possession “one still, doubler, worm, worm tub, mash tub, fermenting used and for use in the manufacture of intoxicating liquor. ’ ’
The second count charged the defendants with the manufacture of intoxicating liquor.
The third count charged the defendants with having in their possession intoxicating liquor.
The Sheriff of Webster County, with a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lohmeyer v. St. Louis Cordage Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- Lowry v. RainwaterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
- Strother v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1918
- State v. PopeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1922
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. HolbertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- State v. YowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- State v. HeppermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
- State v. CaffeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- State v. BrownridgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.