Hinchliffe v. City of San Diego
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, J.
Debra Hinchliffe was hired as a probationary police officer. While still on probation, she was discharged without a hearing before the civil service commission (Commission). Claiming section 129 of the San Diego City Charter (Charter) on the date of her hiring granted such a hearing, she sought a writ of mandate. We hold Hinchliffe’s hearing rights created by the Charter were not vested so as to be immune from modification by the electorate. Thus, the Charter amendment eliminating Commission review for probationary employees did not impinge any constitutionally protected right…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Sonoma County Organization of Public Employees v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Miller v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kemmerer v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Seidler v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- White v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Piombo v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Guarino v. Cnty. of Siskiyou, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.